Representative Client Results

The challenge, the recommendation, and the financial result.

Each engagement below follows the same pattern: independent analysis of the employer's own data, a specific recommendation, and a measurable outcome. Client names are withheld to protect confidentiality.

Manufacturing · 340 employees
12% → 4%
Renewal increase
Challenge
Four consecutive double-digit renewals with no explanation beyond trend, and no claims data in the employer's hands.
Recommendation
Full claims decomposition, a level-funded alternative modeled against two years of experience, and a rebuilt stop-loss specification.
Outcome
Renewal increase reduced to the low single digits and a repeatable multiyear cost model finance now owns.
Professional services · 120 employees
18–22%
Pharmacy spend reduction
Challenge
Pharmacy spend growing faster than medical, with rebate terms buried in a contract nobody had read since signing.
Recommendation
Independent PBM contract review, specialty carve-out analysis and a renegotiated definition set.
Outcome
Pharmacy cost reduction in the high teens, with rebate dollars flowing back to the plan instead of the vendor.
Distribution · 620 employees
$310K
Annual cost avoided
Challenge
Eight years in a PEO with no market comparison, and leadership unsure whether the arrangement still made sense.
Recommendation
Certified PEO marketing analysis plus a direct-carrier comparison against the PEO master plan, normalized to total cost of employment.
Outcome
A board-ready side-by-side that settled the question with evidence and removed six figures of annual cost.
Construction · 210 employees
$96K
Claims audit recovery
Challenge
Eligibility and billing errors accumulating across two carriers with no reconciliation process in place.
Recommendation
Retrospective claims and eligibility audit, carrier invoice reconciliation and a monthly control process.
Outcome
Overpayments recovered and a reconciliation routine that keeps the leakage from returning.
Nonprofit · 85 employees
Audit ready
Fiduciary risk
Challenge
No documented fee disclosure, no vendor scorecard and no CAA 2021 governance file.
Recommendation
Fee transparency review, a written broker scope of services and a documented compliance calendar with owners.
Outcome
A defensible fiduciary file the board can produce on request, built in under 60 days.
Technology · 145 employees
3-year model
Funding evaluation
Challenge
Fully insured with strong claims experience and no visibility into whether the premium reflected it.
Recommendation
Alternative funding evaluation across level-funded, self-funded and captive structures, stress-tested against cash flow.
Outcome
A funding decision leadership could defend, with downside modeled before a single dollar moved.

Results are representative of past engagements and are presented without client names. Outcomes depend on plan data, funding structure, workforce demographics and market conditions, and are not a guarantee of future results.

Industries Served

ManufacturingProfessional ServicesConstructionDistributionNonprofitsHealthcareTechnologyFinancial Services

Next Step

See what the same analysis finds in your plan.

Your claims, your contracts, your funding structure. One written report with dollars attached to every finding.

20-minute conversation. No cost, no obligation, no sales pitch.